Office closure 

We will be closed on Monday 5 May 2025 for the public holiday.  You can still submit complaints via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision report 201100765

  • Case ref:
    201100765
  • Date:
    November 2011
  • Body:
    A Dental Practice, Lothian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    Clinical treatment / Diagnosis

Summary
Ms C complained that her dentist failed to provide appropriate treatment over a two year period. She had raised repeated concerns about pain and sensitivity in her teeth and asked the dentist to take x-rays. The dentist said that this was not required as x-rays had been taken two years previously. She put Ms C's sensitivity down to gingivitis and gum recession.

Ms C sought a second opinion from another dentist. X-rays were taken and showed that she had an abscess and tooth decay. She complained that her own dentist should have diagnosed this.

We found that there was a difference of opinion between Ms C and the dentist as to what information she had provided about her symptoms. The dentist's examination was suitable for a complaint of sensitivity, but not for a complaint of severe pain as described by Ms C. We were compelled, however, by the fact that Ms C sought a second opinion straight after one of her appointments and was found to have a well-developed abscess. We concluded that, on the balance of probabilities, Ms C provided details of her symptoms and the dentist should have taken diagnostic x-rays.

Updated: March 13, 2018