Office closure 

Our office will be closed for the September weekend on Monday 15 September 2025.

You can still submit your complaint via our online form but this will not be processed until we reopen.

Investigation Report 201304738

  • Report no:
    201304738
  • Date:
    March 2015
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview
The complainant (Mrs C) raised a number of concerns with Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board (the Board) regarding the care and treatment her father (Mr A) received while a patient in Glasgow Royal Infirmary (the Hospital).  Mr A died in hospital on 26 November 2013.

Specific complaints and conclusions
The complaints which have been investigated are that the Board did not:

  • provide reasonable care and treatment to Mr A between 25 October and 26 November 2013 (upheld);
  • communicate reasonably with Mr A's family between 25 October and 26 November 2013 (upheld); and
  • respond reasonably to Mrs C's complaints about these matters (upheld).

Redress and recommendations
The Ombudsman recommends that the Board:

  • ensure its policies set out clear responsibilities for clinicians to ensure that tests are either reviewed by the requesting doctor, or handed over to colleagues;
  • carry out a morbidity and mortality case review  of Mr A's death.  The review should include the actions of the Haematology and Orthopaedic departments and provide evidence that the following points were addressed: the handover procedures followed by medical staff; the care and treatment pathways for the management of patients who fracture their hip whilst on a geriatric ward; the failure to ensure that Do Not Attempt Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation was discussed appropriately with the patient or his family; whether the Board's end of life care policies were properly followed; whether Mr A's mental capacity was properly assessed and what procedure should have been followed; review whether there was appropriate and timeous discussion of resuscitation with Mr A's family; review the failure to document in Mr A's records the reason for his ward transfer; review the lack of early Consultant input into case discussions with Mr A or his family;
  • include the findings of the morbidity and mortality review in the subsequent appraisal of the consultant responsible for Mr A's care;
  • remind all staff of the importance of documenting and signing discussions with patients' families;
  • apologise for the failings identified in this report; and
  • provide evidence that the actions referred to in the complaint response letter have been implemented.

The Board have accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

Updated: December 11, 2018