Health

  • Report no:
    200700667
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    A Dental Practice, Lothian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Mrs C) raised concerns about the fact that she was unfairly deregistered from a dental practice (the Practice) when she arrived late for an appointment.

Specific complaint and conclusion

The complaint which has been investigated is that Mrs C was unfairly deregistered from the Practice when she arrived late for an appointment (upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that the Practice:

  • (i) apologise to Mrs C for deregistering her without warning;
  • (ii) review the operation of their no-tolerance policy in light of the National Health Service (General Dental Services) Scotland Regulations 1996; and
  • (iii) make any policies clear in the information which they give to new patients.

The Practice have accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

  • Report no:
    200604106
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    A GP, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Mr C) raised a number of concerns about the treatment his late mother (Mrs A) received from her General Practitioner (the GP) during 2006.  These included issues such as a failure by the GP to action treatment for Mrs A's reported concerns of nausea and weight loss and a failure to diagnose that she was suffering from fluid on her lungs.  In addition, Mr C complained that the GP failed to call an ambulance when Mrs A took ill at the Practice on 29 September 2006.  Mrs A was taken to hospital later the same day by ambulance from her home but sadly did not recover from a coma and died two weeks later.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that the GP:

  • (a) failed to provide treatment for Mrs A's reported concerns of nausea and weight loss and failed to diagnose that she was suffering from fluid on her lungs (not upheld); and
  • (b) failed to call an ambulance when Mrs A took ill at the Practice on 29 September 2006 (not upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman has no recommendations to make.

  • Report no:
    200603030
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    Lothian NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Miss C) raised concerns that she received an inadequate medical examination at the Accident and Emergency Department of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh on 21 December 2005 when she presented with a foot injury.

Specific complaint and conclusion

The complaint which has been investigated is that the medical examination which Miss C received at the Accident and Emergency Department of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh on 21 December 2005 was inadequate (not upheld).

Redress and recommendation

The Ombudsman has no recommendations to make.

  • Report no:
    200602829
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    A GP, Highland NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Ms C) raised concerns about a consultation with her GP on 9 February 2006, in that the GP failed to examine her properly or prescribe appropriate medication for a skin condition.

Specific complaint and conclusion

The complaint which has been investigated is that at a consultation on 9 February 2006, the GP failed to examine Ms C properly or prescribe appropriate medication (not upheld).

Redress and recommendation

The Ombudsman has no recommendations to make.

  • Report no:
    200602521
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Mrs C) complained about the care her late husband (Mr C) received in Ayrshire Central Hospital (the Hospital).  In particular, she was concerned about the rapid deterioration in Mr C's condition during his stay.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a) the care Mr C received was unsatisfactory (upheld);
  • (b) communication from senior medical staff was inadequate (not upheld); and
  • (c) the follow-up to Mrs C's complaint was poorly handled (upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board:

  • (i) undertake training in the recognition of acute physical illness in patients on mental health wards using a well-recognised scoring system such as MEWS (medical early warning score);
  • (ii) apologise to Mrs C for the failings in the care of Mr C identified in this report;
  • (iii) apologise to Mrs C for failing to provide an explanation for the deterioration in Mr C's physical health during his stay in the Hospital; and
  • (iv) take steps to ensure that the findings of critical incident reviews are fully incorporated in their responses to complainants.

The Board have accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

  • Report no:
    200601576
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    Lanarkshire NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant, Mr C, complained that his late mother (Mrs A)'s fluid retention had not been treated correctly while she was in Wishaw General Hospital.  He was concerned, in particular, about a failure to recommence diurectic medication.  He believed that this led to congestion on Mrs A's lungs which he felt was the cause of her death.  Mr C was unhappy that the death certificate said the cause of Mrs A's death was Alzheimer's disease.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a) Mrs A's fluid retention was not treated correctly (upheld); and
  • (b) Mrs A's death certificate was completed incorrectly (upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that the Board:

  • (i) pass a copy of this report to the Clinical Nurse Specialist who audited the ward in 2007 to decide whether it should be reflected in the action plan;
  • (ii) create a structured programme of review of medical records;
  • (iii) share this report with all clinical staff involved in Mrs A's care;
  • (iv) ensure that, when clinical staff are asked to review meetings notes they are, where appropriate, reminded of the importance of checking the accuracy of clinical information provided;
  • (v) apologise to Mrs A's family for the failures in her care;
  • (vi) take steps to correct the error in Mrs A's death certificate or provide acceptable reasons why this cannot be done;
  • (vii) consider whether death certification should be included in the continuing education of medical staff; and
  • (viii) apologise to Mr C for the failure to respond appropriately to his concerns about the error in the death certificate.

The Board have accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

  • Report no:
    200601233
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Miss C) had a number of concerns about the care and treatment given to her late mother (Mrs A) at Ayr Hospital (the Hospital).  In particular, she felt that the Hospital had not correctly dealt with problems Mrs A had had with her legs and had failed to provide Mrs A with treatment in the days prior to her death.  Miss C was also concerned that medical records recorded a conversation between herself and a consultant which she said could not have happened on the date given.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a) the care and treatment provided to Mrs A was not appropriate (partially upheld); and
  • (b) information recording a conversation in the medical records was inaccurate (not upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that the Board apologise to Miss C for the failure to appropriately assess Mrs A's needs following the decision to end active treatment and for failing to ensure all relevant notes were made available to the Ombudsman's office during the initial investigation of this complaint.

The Board have accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

  • Report no:
    200601034
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

Ms C was concerned her son (Mr A) had suffered from a deterioration in his mental illness in 2005 but that this had not been recognised by mental health professionals involved in his care.  As a result, his condition had not been correctly managed.  She believed that, if appropriate care and treatment had been provided, an alleged incident in June 2005 involving Mr A would not have occurred.  She was further unhappy that his contact with Community Psychiatric Nurses was reduced in July 2005 in response to a perceived risk to them.  Ms C was also unhappy about the response she had received from Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board (the Board) following her complaints about this.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a) the care and treatment given to Mr A during 2005 were inadequate (not upheld); and
  • (b) there were failures in the handling of Ms C's complaint (upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that the Board apologise to Ms C for the failures identified in responding to her complaint.

The Board has accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

  • Report no:
    200600276
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    A Dentist, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant (Mrs C) raised a number of concerns about the care and treatment she received from her dentist (the Dentist), and about his attitude in handling her complaint.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a) the Dentist failed to provide Mrs C with dental treatment of a reasonable standard on 4 April 2006 in that he broke her tooth (not upheld);
  • (b) the Dentist mishandled Mrs C's complaint (not upheld); and
  • (c) the Dentist's attitude towards Mrs C was demeaning (no finding).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that the Dentist ensures that appropriate records are kept, including x-ray, in respect of root canal treatment.

  • Report no:
    200503486
  • Date:
    November 2007
  • Body:
    Tayside NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health

Overview

The complainant's (Misses C) raised a number of concerns that their late mother (Mrs C) had been inappropriately treated by a district nurse (Nurse 2) at a home visit.

Specific complaints and conclusions

The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a) Nurse 2 provided inadequate care and treatment leading to a loss of dignity for Mrs C (partially upheld);
  • (b) there were communication failures between nursing staff (upheld); and
  • (c) Tayside NHS Board had failed to deal with appropriately and investigate thoroughly Misses C's complaint (not upheld).

Redress and recommendations

The Ombudsman has no recommendations to make.