Festive closure 

Our office will be closed for the festive period from 25 December 2025 and will reopen on Monday 5 January 2026. Our phone line will close at 11am on 24 December 2025.

You can still submit your complaint via our online form but this will not be processed until we reopen.

Decision Report 201305188

  • Case ref:
    201305188
  • Date:
    April 2015
  • Body:
    Highland NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mr C complained that the board failed to provide him with adequate care and treatment following his admission to A&E at Raigmore Hospital with stroke symptoms. Mr C said that he was not given a thrombolysis injection ('clot buster' therapy which may reverse neurological deficit) and raised concerns about CT scans (scans that use a computer to produce an image of the body) and the prescription of perindopril (a blood pressure lowering agent).

We obtained independent medical advice from a consultant in emergency medicine (adviser 1) and a consultant in general and elderly medicine with a special interest in stroke medicine (adviser 2). Adviser 2 said that thrombolysis was not indicated at any point in Mr C's treatment and would not have been likely to result in Mr C having a better recovery. Had it been indicated, however, it was clear that by the time this was determined it would have been too late to safely administer it. Adviser 1 identified unreasonable delays in A&E and said it was not clear that the nurse who assessed Mr C recognised that his symptoms might be due to a stroke. The advisers found no evidence that the appropriate assessment tool was used when triaging Mr C (deciding where he should be treated based on his condition), and there was also an error in completing a checklist for stroke thrombolysis.

Delays in treatment resulted in an unreasonable delay in a CT scan being carried out. However, our advisers said there was no requirement for the board to carry out a second scan after what Mr C believed was a second stroke after he arrived at hospital. Adviser 2 said that a blood pressure lowering agent such as perindopril should have been prescribed for Mr C on discharge. The board acknowledged their failing in this area and took appropriate remedial action.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • feed back our decision on Mr C's complaint to the staff involved;
  • review their care pathway for identification of patients with a suspected stroke and escalation of care in A&E at Raigmore Hospital to ensure patients with a suspected stroke are appropriately triaged and assessed in line with Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network guidance; and
  • provide Mr C with a written apology for the failings identified.

Updated: March 13, 2018