Festive closure 

Our office will be closed for the festive period from 25 December 2025 and will reopen on Monday 5 January 2026. Our phone line will close at 11am on 24 December 2025.

You can still submit your complaint via our online form but this will not be processed until we reopen.

Decision Report 201507722

  • Case ref:
    201507722
  • Date:
    June 2016
  • Body:
    Dumfries and Galloway NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C's mother (Mrs A) was admitted to the Medical Assessment Unit (MAU) at Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary via A&E after showing signs of a stroke. Whilst in hospital, Mrs A suffered a major stroke. Mrs C raised a number of complaints about the board, including that they unreasonably failed to give Mrs A a clot buster rtPA (an injection to break down blood clots) and that nursing staff failed to monitor Mrs A appropriately.

We obtained independent medical advice from a consultant physician and a nurse. The medical adviser said that the board unreasonably failed to give Mrs A a clot buster rtPA, although they said that the decision would have been a difficult one and would have had to have been made by a specialist.

In addition, the medical adviser said that when Mrs A was in A&E, the board should have carried out a specific risk categorisation using the ABCD2 score (a risk assessment tool designed to improve the prediction of short-term stroke risk after a 'mini stroke'). Had they done so, this would have shown that Mrs A was at very high risk of progression to acute stroke. The medical adviser also said that Mrs A should have been admitted to an acute stroke unit and given a carotid Doppler (a scan to detect a narrowed artery in the neck, which may cause a stroke). She should also have been monitored continuously by experienced staff, rather than being admitted to the MAU. The medical adviser also said that a plan should have been made for Mrs A's care in the event of a deterioration, which should also have been explicit about what to do if new stroke deficits were detected.

Both advisers said the nursing staff did not monitor Mrs A appropriately or observe her every two hours, as required. The medical adviser said that the scoring system used by staff to monitor Mrs A (the Glasgow Coma Scale or GCS) was not entirely suitable. The nursing adviser said that not taking Mrs A's vital signs for a period of over five hours was a serious failing. We upheld Mrs C's complaints and made a number of recommendations to address the failings we identified.

Recommendations

We recommended that the board:

  • feed back the failings identified regarding the clot buster rtPA, the ABCD2 score, carotid Doppler and admission to an acute stroke unit to the staff involved;
  • identify and address training needs for staff in A&E and the MAU on guideline 108 of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network;
  • provide Mrs C and her family with a written apology for the failings identified in the first recommendation;
  • feed back the failings identified in Mrs A's nursing care to the staff involved;
  • complete their review of the use of the GCS score, taking into consideration the medical adviser's views, and provide us with evidence of the outcome of the review; and
  • provide Mrs C and her family with a written apology for the failings identified.

Updated: March 13, 2018